![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ARCHIVES |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
HOME Return to IASB Archives |
![]() |
|
[ 1997 - 97 GSA Entitlement] | |
[ 1997 - 98 ADA ] | x [PCI] x [ADA] = Flat Grant |
(ADA would be the attendance average for the three months of the preceding school year or the average of the prior three years, whichever is greater.) In subsequent years, the flat grant amount (per ADA) would be adjusted by the PCI and then be multiplied by the district's ADA.
Calculation 2 - guaranteed foundation level:
The second calculation would determine the amount of state aid a district would need to guarantee $4,500 per student in average daily attendance. To qualify for the calculation, districts would have to levy a total tax rate in all funds (except Bond and Interest) of at least $1.50 for dual districts and $3.00 for unit districts. The formula would use a $1.50 or $3.00 rate (rather than the district's actual rate) in the calculation as follows:
EAV - Equalized Assessed Valuation
Minimum Qualifying Rates refers to the tax rates to qualify for Calculation 2. As mentioned above, districts would be required to levy a combined tax rate (exclusive of Bond and Interest) of $1.50 (for dual districts) or $3.00 (for unit districts) to qualify for Calculation 2. Districts levying in excess of these rates would generate greater local revenues without being penalized for their efforts by a General State Aid Formula that used actual rates.
Average Daily Attendance will continue to be the attendance average for the best three months of the preceding school year or the average of the prior three years, whichever is greater.
School districts would be funded under whichever of the two calculations in this proposal provided the greater general state aid. Funding on the basis of the better of these two new methods, supporters say, ensures that all Illinois schools would receive increased per pupil funding every year under the new system. This is a benefit not guaranteed by the current system.
Another major component of the plan is property tax relief. Advocates of the plan said Illinois needs a new funding mechanism for schools which would inhibit the need for future property tax hikes, and reverse the rising reliance on local-rather than state-taxes to pay for good schools. "This proposal does both," they said.
Under the proposal, property tax relief would be applied to all rate levies (except Bond and Interest) above the $1.50 or $3.00 Minimum Qualifying Rates. Forty percent (40 %) of the levy above these amounts would be applied to tax abatements for property taxpayers. For example, a unit district with a $5.80 total tax rate (including .10 in Bond and Interest) would use the following tax abatement schedule:
General State Aid = (Foundation Level x ADA) - (EAV x MQR) - CPPRT
General State Aid, under this calculation, would be equalized for qualifying districts of like wealth. Districts making a greater local effort to fund education would not be penalized for doing so.
MQR - Minimum Qualifying Rate
ADA - Average Daily Attendance
CPPTR - Corporate Personal Property Tax Replacement funds
$5.80 - Total Tax Rate -.10 - Bond and Interest Tax Rate ----- $5.70 -3.00 - Minimum Qualifying Rate $2.70 - Rate subject to abatement $2.70 x.40 - Percent of abatement ----- $1.08 - Amount of tax rate abated $5.80 - Actual tax rate -1.08 - Tax rate abated ----- $4.72 - Actual tax rate leviedOn a home worth $150,000 (an EAV of $50,000), the 1.08 tax rate abatement equals a savings of $540.
At-Risk funding changes would also be part of the plan. Districts with at-risk populations greater than the statewide average (currently 18.9 percent) would be eligible for at-risk funding. For each percentage point a district's at-risk student population exceeds the statewide average, the district would receive $30 time the number of students in average daily attendance. For example, consider a district with 1,000 students in ADA, of which 325 are at-risk. The additional funding would be calculated as follows:
32.5 % - Percent at-risk - 18.9 % - At-risk students state average -------- 13.6 % - Over the state average $30 - Per pupil grant multiplier x 13.6% - Percent over state average ------- $408 - Per pupil grant 1,000 - Number of students in ADA x $408 - Per pupil grant -------- $408,000 - At-risk funding grantThe coalition held a series of informational meetings at several sites around the state in January to discuss the proposal.
New Education Department regulations implementing changes made by Congress in 1994 to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) expand the circumstances under which schools can share student records. The rules were published in the November 21 Federal Register.
Schools always have been free to share student records with other schools when students transfer. Now they can release a districtwide notice to inform other schools of a problem student. The new rules also allow schools to release records to state juvenile justice agencies without a student's or parent's consent.
Schools no longer need to maintain a formal student records policy. But they do have to notify parents and students annually about their rights under FERPA.
These results were roughly on par with the success rate for building bond issues in recent years, but below the success rate for the past few elections (63 percent in March 1996, and 56 percent in November 1995). The high-water mark for the success rate of building bond issues (73 percent) was reached in March 1994. That high level was nearly reached again in November 1994, with a 67 percent success rate for building bond questions.
Boasting successful building bond referendums this time around were: Mt. Carroll C.U. District 304, Calumet District 132, Sandridge District 172, Winnetka District 36, Cumberland C.U. District 77, Effingham C.U. District 40, Fremont District 79, Hartsburg-Emden C.U. District 21, Virden C.U. District 4, Woodstock C.U. District 200, Dunlap C.U. District 323, Shiloh Village District 85, and New Lenox District 122.
Besides winning bond questions, the Woodstock and Dunlap districts also won voter approval on tax increase propositions, while Prairie du Rocher C.C. District 134 won just a tax increase.
Other important issues on the November ballot included a defeated proposal in Des Plaines C.C. District 62 to elect board members from board member districts, and three proposals to abandon township representation requirements (which must be approved in every township). The latter, at-large election proposals included: Momence C.U. District 1 (passed), Odell C.U. District 435 (passed), and Oakland C.U. District 5 (failed).
Finally, an advisory question was adopted in favor of the continued existence of a school district in central Illinois, Bradford C.U. District 1.
The list of newly appointed members also includes four individuals with experience on their local school boards, and one former district superintendent.
The nine members appointed to the State Board of Education-all of whom will begin serving upon confirmation by the state Senate-are:
So says the October 1996 publication Core Issues, a newsletter from the law firm of Miller, Tracy, Braun & Wilson, Ltd.
What should boards do? The newsletter suggests adopting a board policy that bars the employment of persons convicted of any serious crime. Contact the law firm at 217/762-9416.
"Bank At School" is a joint effort of the Treasurer's office, elementary schools, and financial institutions throughout the state.
"Our office encourages all schools statewide to participate in `Bank At School,' said the letter from program administrator John Cieslik. "And a perfect time to incorporate `Bank At School' into your curriculum would be in January and February.
To learn more, contact either Joan Zalewski or Bernard Considine in the State Treasurer's Chicago office at 312/814-1700 or Janet Dobrinsky, in Springfield, at 217/782-6540.
Teachers give themselves mediocre grades on their knowledge of the Internet, and only a small number of teachers are using it to help them in teaching, the study found.
While only one-third of teachers (34 percent) are currently taking advantage of the Internet as a resource and teaching tool, most say they would like to use it a good deal more.
"Teachers want access to the Net," said Scott McNealy, chairman of Sun Microsystems, Inc., a California computing firm that markets hardware, software, support and training to teachers. "They recognize the rich resources the Internet can offer the classroom and see the Internet as an invaluable teaching tool. Yet too many teachers do not have access," McNealy said.
Other key findings from the survey:
1. The nation's teachers overwhelmingly endorse the use of the Internet: over half (53 percent) say using it in classrooms is an "excellent" idea and four in 10 (40 percent) say it is a "good" idea.
2. Wiring the schools is a good step because Internet access provides students with "more" and "hard-to-find" information, as well as teaching them the technology they will need to compete in the job market.
3. Similarly, when asked how they would use the Internet, teachers say they are most likely to use it to locate "hard-to-find" resources and information, to teach students technology, and to obtain information on current events.
4. A majority of teachers (58 percent) say they can connect to the Internet at school now. Only a third of teachers (34 percent) are currently using it to help them with teaching.
Teachers feel they and their students need to learn more about the Internet, the study found. Most teachers (53 percent) gave themselves a grade of "C" or "D" on their knowledge of the Internet, and 19 percent gave themselves an "F."
A copy of the report, "Teachers Overwhelmingly Favor Internet in Classrooms" is free from Meredith Hammans, Burson-Marsteller, 125 University Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94301; phone 415/463-4012.
In 28 elementary and middle school classes in seven large cities, both experimental and control classes studied a common unit on civil rights and worked in groups to create project portfolios. On this common unit of study, the online information-using classes scored higher in completeness, demonstration of "best work" efforts, effectiveness of presentation, and more.
Teachers reported that those students also found more information more quickly, viewed the material as more relevant to their lives and were more engaged in the topic. The study, sponsored by the Council of the Great City Schools and Scholastic Network, is available on the Web at http://www.cast.org.
It seems the main cause of their distress is the pressure of growing up too fast.
Today's high-achieving teens worry about their personal safety in the halls at school and report a huge increase in the drug problem among their peers. Teens confront sexual time bombs such as date rape and pregnancy, and worry about their financial and educational futures, the study said.
"The most devastating thing we've learned is that too many of these kids see suicide as the only way out of the morass of problems," said Paul Krouse, publisher of Who's Who Among American High School Students.
"Too many adults often dismiss the notion that being a teenager is hard. After all, what could young people possibly have to worry about? Well . . . much like adults, today's teens have a lot weighing on their minds-affording college, crime and drugs, sexual violence, their economic futures, not to mention their family life."
Selected results of the survey are as follows:
Applicants can propose projects that improve computer-aided learning and training for teachers and educators teaching with technology. Proposals should show the potential for replicating the project.
Applicants are asked to send initial letters of interest before full proposals.
For more information, contact Marti Branch, Compaq Computer Corporation, Box 692000-040511, Houston, TX 77269-2000. Phone: 713/514-0527.
Individuals faced with a thorny problem or issue requiring more immediate attention may call the State Board's problem resolution office at 800/215-6379.
Scientists have learned a great deal in recent years about how the brain develops, how language is acquired, the existence of critical periods for different types of learning, and more. Much has been learned, as well, about how children display different kinds of intelligence, and how various kinds of memory function.
Yet neuroscientists rarely talk to educators.
The Education Commission of the States (ECS) attempted to redress that problem in a workshop held last year that brought together neuroscientists, cognitive psychologists, education researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to explore recent neurological research findings and their implications for education. Among the recommendations from the workshop:
President Clinton announced December 20 that Riley will continue to serve as U.S. Secretary of Education.
In a statement accepting the position for four more years, Riley said: "The President laid out a very bold mainstream education agenda for the second term...from improving literacy, to connecting up to the Internet, to greater access to college for many more Americans."
He said he always thought states and cities should be allowed to provide vouchers to let parents pay for tuition at private schools and supports Milwaukee's right to have such a program, "but I am not going to encourage or discourage it."
The President said he opposes a federal program for private-school vouchers. "Our aid is too limited, as it is too targeted," he said. "And if I were at the state or local level, I would not be in favor of it because I think the schools are underfunded."
But Clinton said he believes state and local governments have the legal right to enact private school voucher programs and he doesn't support "any action to take that legal right away from them." If local and state leaders "think that the situation is totally out of hand and they want to try what they did in Milwaukee, I think they ought to have the right to do it."
When asked whether he had "any initiatives or programs in mind that can reform, if not rescue, the public schools of America," Mr. Clinton responded that "the rescue of the public schools of America will have to be done by the people who are in control of them"
"We do fundamentally have local control of our schools," Mr. Clinton said.
The President also said he supports "the establishment in every state of national standards of excellence and means of ensuring it."
Now that we have National Education Goals, Mr. Clinton said, "the next step is plainly to devise-not federal government [standards]-but national standards of excellence." Then, there has to be "a nationally recognized means of testing kids so that we know, by some more or less universal standards, whether our kids know what they're supposed to know."
"Unless we're prepared to hold all of our kids up to the light of real measurement," he said, "we'll never succeed in having a genuine national education system."
The FRN is a nationwide organization of local school board members, coordinated by the National School Boards Association.
The theme of this year's FRN Conference is "New Election, New Congress, New Agenda." Three priority issues will be emphasized: 1) continuing efforts to improve special education; 2) passing new legislation to curb mandates and regulations on schools; and 3) drawing the line against taxpayer-funded vouchers.
A full day of lobbying on Capitol Hill is planned for January 28. Prior to that, FRN delegates will get briefings on major education issues that will be considered by Congress this year.
The presentation, conducted by Jamie Vollmer & Associates, is designed to offer entertaining and practical suggestions to halt the erosion of public trust, and promote community-wide approval for school plans for the future. It will:
The registration fee is $385 ($65 for additional attendees from same district). To register call the Local Control Project Office at 515/472-1558.
The 1997 national conference will allow local school leaders to meet with business leaders to exchange ideas, build effective and practical solutions, and initiate or strengthen policies and programs that support family and employee involvement in education.
Conference organizers say speakers will describe how they:
A special workshop curriculum designed to help new school board members face the challenges of school board service will be taught by several of the best board development facilitators in the country. Pat Fitzwater, consultant and long-time board development director for the Oregon School Boards Association, will lead the workshops.
Details on registration, housing, speaker biographies, seminar descriptions, and Anaheim dining and attractions are available from the NSBA Annual Conference fax-on-demand system. Phone 800/934-3967 for a complete listing of conference documents.
For additional Conference information, or to register, call NSBA toll-free at 800/950-6722.
The grant will fund a policy makers tool kit that will include a broad range of strategies and techniques for utilizing technology to improve student achievement. The tool kit will be delivered to school board members and other decision makers electronically as well as in more traditional formats.
The kit will cover a range of technology-related topics, including models of successful school programs that use technology, research findings on the value of technology, effective strategies for staff development as well as advice on funding and involving the entire community in bringing technology to the classroom.
Information in the tool kit will be available without charge to school board members throughout the United States via the World Wide Web on the NSBA's Institute for the Transfer of Technology (ITTE) home page (www.nsba.org/itte).
The total number of sites is more than three times greater than one year ago:
1995 | 1996 | 1997 | Increase (96 - 97) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Elementary | 47 | 618 | 2,424 | 392% |
Secondary | 107 | 1,305 | 3,745 | 286% |
Total | 154 | 1,923 | 6,169 | 320% |
The numbers come from a K-12 web project called Web 66, online at http://web66.umn.edu/
Web 66 features the Internet's oldest and most comprehensive list of school web sites. The Web 66 International Registry of School Web Sites now has over 5,566 school home pages listed. It includes clickable maps of Australia, Canada, Europe, Japan and the United States.
The Web 66 site also features a wealth of information to help schools set up their own Internet site.
Each site in the American School Directory (ASD) will display the school name, colors, mascot, basic information, a daily announcement board, a wish list seeking contributions, space for student work, and more. Also included will be an alumni registration page, an ASD search option and links to a map showing the school's location and to teacher and student home pages.
Schools that choose to tailor material to their needs will also feature a link to a "School Store" selling books, magazines and education software, with part of the proceeds to be applied to school acquisitions of technology. Computers for Education operates a similar arrangement with schools based on students' sales of magazine subscriptions.
For more information, see the ASD beta test Web site, http://204.146.213.157; contact ASD, 180 Freedom Ave., P.O. Box 7003, Murfreesboro, TN 37133-7003; 800/444-4488; or contact Elijah Collard, vice president of marketing of Computers for Education, at 615/896-3800, http://www.cfe.com.
January 6: IASB Constitution and Position Statements booklet, mailed to district superintendents.
More than $608 million was invested in the Certificate of Deposit program, at rates ranging from 5.15 percent for a 30-day certificate to 5.73 percent for a one-year certificate. For more information about ISDLAF+, call, toll-free, 1-800/221-4524.
FOR SALE: 400 student lockers-Republic Steel brand, combination locks, good condition. Size: 12" x 15" x 36". One library circulation desk. One complete science lab with lab tables, sinks, gas jets, electrical outlets, fume hood, and storage. Also six dissection/lecture tables with slate tops, good condition. All available June, 1997. Contact Dr. John Metzger, Superintendent, Johnston City School District. Phone 618/983-8021.
American School Directory creates web sites
All 106,000 K-12 American schools, public and private, will soon have a free site on the World Wide Web-wanted or not-from Computers for Education in collaboration with IBM and Vanderbilt University. Recent mailings from IASB
Not all IASB mailings are sent to all school board members. For speed or economy, some mailings are sent only to the board president, business official or district superintendent. Here is a list of such items mailed recently. For more information about any item, contact your board president or district superintendent or get in touch with IASB.Illinois School District Liquid Asset Fund Plus
As of January 13, school districts had invested more than $175 million in the Illinois School District Liquid Asset Fund Plus, an investment pool that provides safe investments for school districts with immediate access to invested funds and competitive rates of return. As of January 13, the daily rate of return was 5.02 percent.Classified ads
WANTED: Tri-Valley C.U. District 3 is interested in purchasing a used portable classroom. The building should be of sufficient size to house two classrooms. If interested, please contact Dr. Steven Epperson, Superintendent, at 309/378-2351.
IASB School Board News Bulletin
This newsletter is published by the Illinois Association of School Boards for member boards of education and their superintendents. The Illinois Association of School Boards, an Illinois not-for-profit corporation, is a voluntary association of local boards of education and is not affiliated with any branch of government.
Illinois Association of School Boards
2921 Baker Drive
Springfield, Illinois 62703-5929
Phone: 217/528-9688
Fax: 217/528-2831
One Imperial Place
1 East 22nd Street, Suite 20
Lombard, Illinois 60148
Phone: 630/629-3776
Fax: 630/629-3940