Issues in education
A roundup of issues of concern to school leaders
Looping
It sounds like a playground game, or perhaps a new dance craze. But
looping is neither: it's the practice of keeping a teacher and students
together for at least two years. The practice is common in European,
Japanese, and Montessori schools.
The idea is that teachers and students form a bond over time that appears
to provide several benefits. Teachers become significant figures in
children's lives, providing a strong adult influence that is particularly
important for those who don't get enough attention from parents. Less class
time is spend on getting acquainted and review, allowing more teaching
time. Teachers learn more about their students and are able to better
tailor the curriculum to their needs. Attendance and discipline appear to
improve.
The quality of teachers becomes more important than ever, as their
influence increases, and care must be taken to integrate newcomers into the
class. And the inevitable ultimate separation needs to be handled with
care.
There is little formal research on looping, reports the National
School Boards Association News Service, although there is anecdotal
evidence that it is beneficial. On the other hand, it costs almost nothing
to try and isn't likely to do any damage.
Source: National School Boards Association News Service
Competent kids
Are today's children more competent that is, more savvy and able to
deal with the harsh realities of life than children used to be? That's a
myth invented by adults who need children to be competent, says David
Elkind. Elkind, professor of child study at Tufts University and author of
Ties That Stress: The New Family Imbalance, says adults overestimate the
ability of children to cope.
In an interview in Educational Leadership magazine, Elkind says: "As I
travel and lecture across the country, teachers tell me routinely that they
see much more aggressive behavior and much more hostility on the
playgrounds. We see many more learning problems. We see much more
depression in children. These are all the stress symptoms of kids who are
expected to be more competent in handling all sorts of experiences than
they really are."
What do children need? According to Elkind, the same thing they've
always needed: to know that they are important to their parents. "We talk a
lot about quality time, but it's not really the quality of the time that is
important. What is critical is that the children feel that they are
important enough in their parents' lives that the parents are going to
sacrifice something for them. Real quality time is when parents say, `Look,
I know I have this meeting but you are more important and I am going to
come to your recital.'"
Source: Educational Leadership, April, 1996
Bill of rights for students, staff
Since the beginning of our nation, Americans have cherished the Bill
of Rights that protects basic freedoms. Now, the American Federation of
Teachers proposes a bill of rights for students and school staff. In brief,
the ten-point document proclaims the rights of students and school staff
to:
- Go to schools that are safe, orderly and drug free.
- Learn and work in an environment of "clear discipline codes with
fair and consistently enforced consequences for misbehavior."
- Benefit from "alternative educational placement for violent or
chronically disruptive students."
- "Be treated with courtesy and respect."
- Have "clearly stated and rigorous academic standards."
- Attend "well-equipped schools that have the instructional materials
needed to carry out a rigorous academic program."
- Have a staff of teachers who "know their subject matter and how to
teach it."
- Thrive in a school climate "where high grades stand for high
achievement and promotion is earned."
- Live in a community where people believe "a high school diploma
means having the knowledge and skills essential for college or a good job."
- "Be supported by parents, the community, public officials, and
business in their efforts to uphold high standards of conduct with
achievement."
Urging school board members to endorse the document, Tom Shannon, the
retiring executive director of the National School Boards Association,
commented that "AFT has succeeded in capsulizing the major concerns parents
have expressed about their public schools in a context that places students
and teachers as beneficiaries of what clearly is a sound environment for
learning in any school And what school board member or superintendent could
sensibly disagree with that approach or with any particular part of the AFT
bill of rights?"
Source: National School Boards Association News Service
Stiffer security is not the answer
Schools that rely on security measures such as metal detectors to
calm student fears and prevent tragedies are deluding themselves, according
to Peter Blauvelt, president of the National Alliance for Safe Schools.
Speaking at a National School Boards Association Leadership Conference,
Blauvelt told leaders of state school board associations that measures such
as metal detectors in schools are as ineffective as efforts to stop the
flow of drugs into the country. Instead, he told the audience to "take back
the controls."
Educators must come up with a way to deal with students' fears before
the students take matters into their own hands, Blauvelt said. "When a
student is assaulted, spends time out of school, comes back to school, and
no adult talks to him about what happened, the next time that student is
bullied, you can bet he will protect himself."
Instead, Blauvelt recommends a program called Operation SAFE Schools
Against Fearful Environments. The program calls for a team at each school
to help students identify and discuss their fears. "The answer isn't more
security at all," he stressed. "It's that educators need to be
cheerleaders, they need to believe they are in control."
Source: National School Boards Association News Service
Principals' concerns
What concerns school principals? A poll of 802 elementary and middle
school principals, conducted by the National Association of Elementary
School Principals (NAESP), shows the following priorities:
- Motivating students (97 percent);
- Involving parents in their children's schoolwork (94 percent);
- Accommodating and paying for increasing numbers of special education
children (93 percent);
- Keeping up with education technology (93 percent).
- Accepting, and getting staff to accept, additional social
responsibilities that once belonged in the home, such as good manners,
honesty, etc. (91 percent).
By contrast, the principals worried less about competing with private,
for-profit companies (32 percent), sharing decision-making authority with
parents and community (50 percent), and handling local pressures for school
choice, vouchers and charter schools (49 percent).
Source: Fax news service of the National School Public Relations
Association, March 22, 1996.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE -- This document is © copyrighted by the Illinois
Association of School Boards. IASB hereby grants to school districts and
other Internet users the right to download, print and reproduce this
document provided that (a) the Illinois Association of School Boards is
prominently noted as publisher and copyright holder of the document and (b)
any reproductions of this document are disseminated without charge and not
used for any commercial purpose.